Simulations of the Atmospheric General Circulation Using a Cloud-Resolving Model as a Superparameterization of Physical Processes
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Vol. 62 (7) , 2136-2154
- https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3453.1
Abstract
Traditionally, the effects of clouds in GCMs have been represented by semiempirical parameterizations. Recently, a cloud-resolving model (CRM) was embedded into each grid column of a realistic GCM, the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), to serve as a superparameterization (SP) of clouds. Results of the standard CAM and the SP-CAM are contrasted, both using T42 resolution (2.8° × 2.8° grid), 26 vertical levels, and up to a 500-day-long simulation. The SP was based on a two-dimensional (2D) CRM with 64 grid columns and 24 levels collocated with the 24 lowest levels of CAM. In terms of the mean state, the SP-CAM produces quite reasonable geographical distributions of precipitation, precipitable water, top-of-the-atmosphere radiative fluxes, cloud radiative forcing, and high-cloud fraction for both December–January–February and June–July–August. The most notable and persistent precipitation bias in the western Pacific, during the Northern Hemisphere summer of all the SP-CAM runs with 2D SP, seems... Abstract Traditionally, the effects of clouds in GCMs have been represented by semiempirical parameterizations. Recently, a cloud-resolving model (CRM) was embedded into each grid column of a realistic GCM, the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), to serve as a superparameterization (SP) of clouds. Results of the standard CAM and the SP-CAM are contrasted, both using T42 resolution (2.8° × 2.8° grid), 26 vertical levels, and up to a 500-day-long simulation. The SP was based on a two-dimensional (2D) CRM with 64 grid columns and 24 levels collocated with the 24 lowest levels of CAM. In terms of the mean state, the SP-CAM produces quite reasonable geographical distributions of precipitation, precipitable water, top-of-the-atmosphere radiative fluxes, cloud radiative forcing, and high-cloud fraction for both December–January–February and June–July–August. The most notable and persistent precipitation bias in the western Pacific, during the Northern Hemisphere summer of all the SP-CAM runs with 2D SP, seems...Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global consequences of interactions between clouds and radiation at scales unresolved by global climate modelsGeophysical Research Letters, 2005
- Seasonal migration of ITCZ precipitation across the equator: Why can't GCMs simulate it?Geophysical Research Letters, 2003
- Confronting Models with Data: The GEWEX Cloud Systems StudyBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2003
- The Community Climate System ModelBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2001
- A cloud resolving model as a cloud parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate System Model: Preliminary resultsGeophysical Research Letters, 2001
- Diurnal Variation of Precipitation over the Tropical Oceans Observed by TRMM/TMI Combined with SSM/IJournal of Climate, 2000
- Explicit Simulation of Cumulus Ensembles with the GATE Phase III Data: Comparison with ObservationsJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1996
- Analyses of Global Monthly Precipitation Using Gauge Observations, Satellite Estimates, and Numerical Model PredictionsJournal of Climate, 1996
- Climate Simulations with a Semi-Lagrangian Version of the NCAR Community Climate ModelMonthly Weather Review, 1994
- A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air‐mass data setsQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1986