A Pair of Techniques for Effective Interface Evaluation: Cognitive Walkthroughs and Think-Aloud Evaluations
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Vol. 41 (1) , 380-384
- https://doi.org/10.1177/107118139704100184
Abstract
Developing effective user interfaces is an iterative process. Early evaluations tend to focus on finding severe problems that need to be fixed as early as possible. As the design evolves, attention shifts toward smaller details so less severe problems are also of interest. To succeed, it is important to apply the most effective evaluation techniques at each stage. In this paper, we explain why cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud evaluations complement each other and report the results of a study that compares these techniques for use late in the development process. Our study shows that cognitive walkthroughs find the most severe usability problems along with desirable new features and functionality, while think-aloud evaluations find all types of usability problems. This paper adds to our understanding of interface evaluation techniques and provides practical advice for developers searching for techniques that are effective throughout the development process.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heuristic Walkthroughs: Finding the Problems Without the NoiseInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1997
- Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypesPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1996
- Learning and using the cognitive walkthrough methodPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1995
- Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluationPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1992