Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research

Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Clinical research on important questions about the efficacy of medical interventions is sometimes followed by subsequent studies that either reach opposite conclusions or suggest that the original claims were too strong. Such disagreements may upset clinical practice and acquire publicity in both scientific circles and in the lay press. Several empirical investigations have tried to address whether specific types of studies are more likely to be contradicted and to explain observed controversies. For example, evidence exists that small studies may sometimes be refuted by larger ones.1,2

This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit: