The Impossible Dream of Fechner and Stevens
- 1 August 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 10 (4) , 431-434
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p100431
Abstract
The idea that there is a single psychophysical function which describes how the human responds to stimulus intensity is rejected. The form of any empirical function depends upon the buried yet arbitrary assumption about how the stimuli are to be measured. Because psychophysical functions have this arbitrary basis, there can be no universal law, and further, no psychophysical function can reveal a general truth about the nervous system. The power law has been inappropriately reified; the descriptive usefulness of the power function has been incorrectly extended, perhaps because simplicity is appealing.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weak inference with linear models.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Monotonic Weighted Power Transformations to AdditivityPsychometrika, 1977
- Reply to the devil's advocates: Don't confound model testing and measurement.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- 342. Note: Correlation for Power FunctionsPublished by JSTOR ,1972
- Subjective intensity of mineral taste in water.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965
- Is the Power Law a Special Case of Fechner's Law?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964
- A Note on Treisman's ModelQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- Effect of spacing and range of stimuli on magnitude estimation judgements.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Transformation of the Independent VariablesTechnometrics, 1962
- On the possible psychophysical laws.Psychological Review, 1959