Carrying capacity models should not use fixed prey density thresholds: a plea for using more tools of behavioural ecology
- 9 January 2004
- Vol. 104 (1) , 197-204
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2003.12214.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE COSTS OF APPREHENSIVE FORAGINGEcology, 2002
- Carrying capacity in overwintering migratory birdsBiological Conservation, 2002
- Depletion models can predict shorebird distribution at different spatial scalesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- A Field Test of Ideal Free Distribution in Flock-Feeding Common CranesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1995
- Age-Dependent Choice of Redshank (Tringa totanus) Feeding Location: Profitability or Risk?Journal of Animal Ecology, 1994
- Carrying Capacity of Staging Areas and Facultative Migration Extension in Common CranesJournal of Applied Ecology, 1994
- Foraging Under Predation - a Comparison of Energetic and Predation Costs in Rodent Communities of the Negev and Sonoran DesertsAustralian Journal of Zoology, 1994
- Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competitionBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1988
- Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging MinnowsEcology, 1987
- Time Budgeting and Group Size: A TheoryEcology, 1979