The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal™ as a Temporary Ventilatory Device in Grossly and Morbidly Obese Patients Before Laryngoscope-Guided Tracheal Intubation
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 94 (3) , 737-740
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200203000-00048
Abstract
We determined the efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) as a temporary ventilatory device in morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Sixty patients (body mass index 35–60 kg/m2) scheduled for elective surgery, who preferred airway management under general anesthesia, were studied. The induction of anesthesia was with midazolam/fentanyl/propofol and maintenance was with sevoflurane 1%–3% in oxygen 100%. The PLMA was inserted and an effective airway established. Rocuronium was given IV for paralysis. Oropharyngeal leak pressure, ease of gastric tube placement, residual gastric volume, fiberoptic position of the airway/drainage tube, and ease of ventilation at a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg was determined. The PLMA was then removed and laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation attempted. The number of insertion/intubation attempts (maximum two each) and time taken to establish an effective airway with each device were recorded. An effective airway was obtained at the first insertion attempt in 90% of patients (54/60) and at the second attempt in 10% (6/60). The time taken to provide an effective airway was 15 ± 7 s (7–42 s). Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 32 ± 8 cm H2O (12–40 cm H2O). The residual gastric volume was 36 ± 46 mL (0–240 mL). Positive pressure ventilation without air leaks was possible in 95% of patients (57/60). The vocal cords were seen from the airway tube in 75% of patients (45/60), but the esophagus was not seen. The fiberoptic view from the drainage tube revealed mucosa in 93% of patients (56/60) and an open upper esophageal sphincter in 7% (4/60). Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in 90% of patients (54/60), at the second attempt in 7% (4/60), and failed in 3% (2/60). In these latter two patients, the PLMA was reinserted and surgery performed uneventfully with the PLMA. The time taken to tracheally intubate the patient was 13 ± 10 s (8–51 s). There were no episodes of hypoxia (Spo2Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positive Pressure Ventilation with the ProSeal Versus Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized, Crossover Study of Healthy Female PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- The ProSeal Laryngeal Mask AirwayAnesthesiology, 2000
- Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal maskAnaesthesia, 1996
- Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1996
- Die Kehlkopfmaske in der ambulanten AnästhesieAINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie, 1994
- Laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure and position during anaesthesia lasting one to two hoursCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1994
- Mallampati classification and laryngeal mask airway insertionAnaesthesia, 1993
- Management of the Difficult Adult Airway With Special Emphasis on Awake Tracheal IntubationAnesthesiology, 1991
- Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective studyAnaesthesia, 1987
- Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetricsAnaesthesia, 1984