Prognostic importance of delayed Q-wave evolution 3 to 24 hours after initiation of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 67 (4) , 231-235
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90551-u
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prevalence and clinical significance of residual myocardial ischemia 2 weeks after uncomplicated non-Q wave infarction: a prospective natural history study.Circulation, 1986
- Prognosis after extension of myocardial infarct: the role of Q wave or non-Q wave infarction.Circulation, 1985
- Q- Versus non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: Clinical characteristics and 6-month prognosisClinical Cardiology, 1984
- Long-term prognosis after first Q-wave (transmural) or non-Q-wave (nontransmural) myocardial infarction: Analysis of 593 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Recurrent myocardial infarction: clinical predictors and prognostic implications.Circulation, 1982
- Factors presaging early recurrent myocardial infarction (“Extension”)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Nontransmural myocardial infarction: A comparison of hospital and late clinical course of patients with that of matched patients with transmural anterior and transmural inferior myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- The influence of location and extent of myocardial infarction on long-term ventricular dysrhythmia and mortality.Circulation, 1979
- Survival of patients with nontransmural myocardial infarction: A population-based studyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- The short- and long-term prognosis of patients with transmural and nontransmural myocardial infarctioThe American Journal of Medicine, 1976