Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics – preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives
- 12 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 12 (2) , 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201118
Abstract
Genetics can pose special challenges to the principle of confidentiality within the health professional–patient relationship, since genetic information is by its nature both individual and familial. Most professional guidelines allow confidentiality to be broken in rare circumstances, where it will prevent a 'serious', 'imminent' and 'likely' harm. We argue that the types of harms that may result from genetic medicine are particularly diverse. Using clinical examples, we explore ethical issues that arise when balancing individual and family member interests. As genetic testing becomes more, widespread situations will arise where clinicians are faced with a choice between preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to another. Professionals need to incorporate the notion of familial implications in their counseling of individuals. Since such dilemmas have been relatively rare in the pre-genetic age, we call for a wider debate on the balance between confidentiality and harm to others.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concern for families and individuals in clinical geneticsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2003
- Working towards ethical management of genetic testingThe Lancet, 2002
- Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patientsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2002
- Genetic information and the family: are we our brother's keeper?Trends in Biotechnology, 2002
- The Family Covenant and Genetic TestingAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2001
- Ethical debate: Results of genetic testing: when confidentiality conflicts with a duty to warn relatives Case study Act to resolve conflict View from Dutch general practice Family duty is more important than rightsBMJ, 2000
- Benefit‐sharing and other protections for communities in genetic researchClinical Genetics, 2000
- Clinical geneticists' attitudes and practice towards testing for breast cancer susceptibility genesJournal of Medical Genetics, 2000
- Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1999
- Control of DNA Samples and InformationGenomics, 1998