Relation of Task Difficulty to Persistence
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 86 (3) , 787-794E
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.787
Abstract
The present study was a replication and expansion of Eisenberger's 1992 model of learned industriousness which states that task persistence is determined by one's prior history with effort and reinforcement on previous tasks. He predicted a linear relationship between these factors. College students (32 women and 22 men) participated in this study which examined the relationship among seven levels of difficulty on a digit-array task and persistence on an unsolvable anagram task. Analysis indicated a quadratic relationship; at intermediate levels of difficulty and reinforcement, persistence was highest, and at low and high levels of difficulty and reinforcement, persistence declined. We attribute these findings to the effects of both learned industriousness and learned helplessness.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learned industriousness.Psychological Review, 1992
- The Effects of Force Training and Reinforcement Schedules on Human PerformanceThe American Journal of Psychology, 1981
- Effects of Conceptual Task Difficulty on Generalized PersistenceThe American Journal of Psychology, 1980
- Transfer of effort across behaviorsLearning and Motivation, 1979
- Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on tasks of differing importance: Facilitation and learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975