They All Look the Same to Me (Unless They're Angry)
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (10) , 836-840
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x
Abstract
People often find it more difficult to distinguish ethnic out-group members compared with ethnic in-group members. A functional approach to social cognition suggests that this bias may be eliminated when out-group members display threatening facial expressions. In the present study, 192 White participants viewed Black and White faces displaying either neutral or angry expressions and later attempted to identify previously seen faces. Recognition accuracy for neutral faces showed the out-group homogeneity bias, but this bias was entirely eliminated for angry Black faces. Indeed, when participants' cognitive processing capacity was constrained, recognition accuracy was greater for angry Black faces than for angry White faces, demonstrating an out-group heterogeneity bias.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- “We All Look the Same to Me”Psychological Science, 2005
- An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance TestsPsychological Science, 2005
- Relational aggression in college students: Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathyAggressive Behavior, 2003
- Sexually Selective Cognition: Beauty Captures the Mind of the Beholder.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorizationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?Cognition and Emotion, 2000
- Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive IntegrationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- Measuring recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1992
- The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Psychological Review, 1992
- Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988