QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR pT2 PROSTATE CANCER: IMPACT OF VIDEO DOCUMENTATION REVIEW ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 173 (3) , 765-768
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000146574.52402.d5
Abstract
We correlated intraoperative video documentation and pathology findings to understand the mechanisms by which positive surgical margins occur and improve the surgical technique. Between January 2003 and May 2004, 240 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, of whom 180 had pT2 prostate cancer and represent the population of this study. After the first 90 patients (group 1) we started a quality assurance study, analyzing intraoperative video recordings and correlating them with pathology findings in patients with a positive margin. The cancer characteristics and positive margin rate were compared between the first 90 patients and the subsequent 90 after the study was initiated (group 2). Of the 12 cases of positive surgical margins studied the video review helped identify 8 with a technical error. In all 4 cases in which a technical error could not be identified the positive margin site was at the distal apex. The most frequent identifiable mechanism by which positive margins occurred was a capsular tear during neurovascular bundle dissection. The 2 groups were comparable in regard to preoperative cancer characteristics and total tumor volume. In patients who underwent bilateral nerve sparing the positive margin rate was 10.6% in group 1 and 5.4% in group 2 (p = 0.18). All positive margins in group 2 involved the prostatic apex. Quality assurance efforts through pathological and intraoperative documentation review can help decrease the positive margin rate, particularly in organ confined disease. However, eradicating positive margins at the distal prostatic apex remains a challenge.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2004
- Variations Among Individual Surgeons in the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 2003
- PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2002
- Utilizing Predictions of Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure to Optimize Patient Selection for Adjuvant Systemic Therapy TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Use of intraoperative video documentation to improve sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomyUrology, 2000
- Postoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Biological Determinants of Cancer Progression in Men With Prostate CancerJAMA, 1999
- INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSUrologic Clinics of North America, 1996
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- 5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994