Screening for bacteriuria: Microstix and dipslides
- 1 May 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Vol. 53 (619) , 248-250
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.53.619.248
Abstract
Summary: The Microstix system has been tested, in parallel with dipslides, for suitability as a screening technique for the detection of bacteriuria. Results obtained using each method on 228 urine specimens were assessed by comparison with the results of quantitative counts. Dipslides had a higher sensitivity (86-7%) than Microstix. The best specificity (100%) was obtained from those results (77-6%) where both components of the Microstix system were in agreement. Advantages of Microstix are its greater shelf-life and its compactness.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of Urinary Tract Infections in 3- to 5-Year-Old Girls by Mothers Using a Nitrite Indicator StripPediatrics, 1976
- Comparison of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1976
- Cost-effectiveness of two methods of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1976
- Rapid Miniaturized Tests for Bacteriuria: Microstix and Bacturcult Urine TestsJournal of Urology, 1975
- Evaluation of new urinary tract infection screening devices.1973
- SCREENING FOR ASYMPTOMATIC URINARY-TRACT INFECTION IN SCHOOLGIRLS: A Two-centre Feasibility StudyThe Lancet, 1973
- Bacteriuria and Pyelonephritis of PregnancyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1960