The Stability of Congressional Roll-Call Indexes
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 48 (2) , 403-416
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800210
Abstract
This study builds on previous work that has shown congressional roll-call indexes to be both reliable and valid indicators of House members' ideolo gy. Using a longitudinal set of data comprised of Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) ratings, Americans for Conservative Action (ACA) scores, Congressional Quarterly's Conservative Coalition (CC) ratings and Nation al Journal's (NJ) scores, we examine the stability of the indexes using a con firmatory factor model. The results confirm the high level of validity and reliability found previously and provide evidence of an equally high level of stability. Congressional roll-call indexes, though based on a sampling of votes taken in the House of Representatives, perform quite well with regard to these three measurement characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern DemocratsThe Journal of Politics, 1993
- Artificial Extremism in Interest Group RatingsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1992
- Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1992
- Patterns of Congressional VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1991
- The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll-Call IndexesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1990
- Common, Specific, and Error Variance Components of Factor ModelsSociological Methods & Research, 1987
- How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the U. S. CongressLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1982
- Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary ProcessAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- Measurement Identity in the Longitudinal Analysis of Legislative VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959