The case for single-patient studies
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Vol. 5 (5) , 517-527
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298808253271
Abstract
It is argued that only single-patient studies allow valid inferences about normal cognitive processes from the analysis of acquired cognitive disorders. The arguments in favour of this position support the further claim that clinical classifications such as agrammatism and deep dyslexia are theoretically useless.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- In defense of agrammatismCognition, 1986
- On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studiesBrain and Cognition, 1986
- On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatismCognition, 1985
- A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of languageApplied Psycholinguistics, 1980
- Case study approach in neuropsychological researchJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1979