Clinically Relevant Genotype Interpretation of Resistance to Didanosine
Open Access
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 49 (5) , 1739-1744
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.5.1739-1744.2005
Abstract
We analyzed the didanosine (ddI) arm of the randomized, placebo-controlled Jaguar trial in order to define a genotypic score for ddI associated with virologic response. In this arm, 111 patients experiencing virologic failure received ddI in addition to their current combination therapy for 4 weeks. The impact of mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene on the virologic response to ddI was studied in univariate analysis. Genotypic score was constructed using step-by-step analyses first including only mutations associated to poorer virologic response (scored as +1), while secondarily, mutations associated to a better response (scored as −1) were also eligible. Eight mutations were associated with a reduced response to ddI, M41L, D67N, T69D, L74V, V118I, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E, and two mutations were associated with a better response, K70R and M184V/I. The best prediction of the virologic response to ddI was obtained with a composite score comprising mutations added and subtracted (set II, M41L + T69D + L74V+ T215Y/F + K219Q/E − K70R − M184V/I; P = 4.5 × 10−9) and by comparing that to only mutations added (set I, M41L + T69D + L74V + L210W + T215Y/F + K219Q/E; P = 1.2 × 10−7). Patients had a human immunodeficiency virus RNA reduction of 1.24, 0.84, 0.61, 0.40, and 0.07 log10 copies/ml when they were ranked as having a genotypic score II of −2, −1, or 0 or 1 and 2 mutations or more, respectively. In conclusion, we developed and validated a genotypic score, taking into account mutations negatively and positively impacting the virologic response to ddI.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Didanosine in HIV‐1–Infected Patients Experiencing Failure of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Placebo‐Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Stable prevalence of genotypic drug resistance mutations but increase in non-B virus among patients with primary HIV-1 infection in FranceAIDS, 2003
- Thymidine analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors resistance mutations profiles and association to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors resistance mutations observed in the context of virological failureJournal of Medical Virology, 2003
- Broad Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor Cross‐Resistance in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clinical IsolatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Clinically relevant interpretation of genotype for resistance to abacavirAIDS, 2003
- The clinical relevance of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor hypersusceptibilityAIDS, 2002
- Patterns of Resistance Mutations Selected by Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection with Zidovudine, Didanosine, and NevirapineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Development of resistance to zidovudine (ZDV) and didanosine (ddl) in HIV from patients in ZDV, ddl and alternating ZDV/ddl therapyAIDS, 1996
- Combination Therapy with Zidovudine and Didanosine Selects for Drug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Strains with Unique Patterns of pol Gene MutationsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994
- A DISTRIBUTION-FREE k-SAMPLE TEST AGAINST ORDERED ALTERNATIVESBiometrika, 1954