Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 81 (12) , 1661-1666
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661
Abstract
Beginning with the swine flu litigation of the early 1980s, epidemiological evidence has played an increasingly prominent role in helping the nation's courts deal with alleged causal connections between plaintiffs' diseases or other harm and exposure to specific noxious agents (such as asbestos, toxic waste, radiation, and pharmaceuticals). Judicial reliance on epidemiology has high-lighted the contrast between the nature of scientific proof and of legal proof. Epidemiologists need to recognize and understand the growing involvement of their profession in complex tort litigation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scientific and legal standards of statistical evidence in toxic tort and discrimination suitsLaw and Philosophy, 1990
- DNA fingerprinting in the twilight zone.1990
- At Law: DNA Fingerprinting in the Twilight ZoneHastings Center Report, 1990
- White Swans, Black Ravens, and Lame Ducks: Necessary and Sufficient Causes in EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 1990
- Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical EvidenceThe Yale Law Journal, 1986
- Legal and Scientific Probability of Causation of Cancer and Other Environmental Disease in IndividualsJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1985
- The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A "Public Law" Vision of the Tort SystemHarvard Law Review, 1984
- NoticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1965
- Acute Appendicitis and Direct Inguinal HerniaBMJ, 1946