Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study
- 21 January 2005
- Vol. 330 (7489) , 441
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38335.390718.82
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relation between access to a cardiac catheterisation laboratory and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Design Prospective, multinational, observational registry. Setting Patients enrolled in 106 hospitals in 14 countries between April 1999 and March 2003. Participants 28 825 patients aged > 18 years. Main outcome measures Use of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, death, infarction after discharge, stroke, or major bleeding. Results Most patients (77%) across all regions (United States, Europe, Argentina and Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) were admitted to hospitals with catheterisation facilities. As expected, the availability of a catheterisation laboratory was associated with more frequent use of percutaneous coronary intervention (41% v 3.9%, P < 0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft (7.1% v 0.7%, P < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, medical history, and geographical region there were no significant differences in the risk of early death between patients in hospitals with or without catheterisation facilities (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.30, for death in hospital; hazard ratio 1.05, 0.93 to 1.18, for death at 30 days). The risk of death at six months was significantly higher in patients first admitted to hospitals with catheterisation facilities (hazard ratio 1.14, 1.03 to 1.26), as was the risk of bleeding complications in hospital (odds ratio 1.94, 1.57 to 2.39) and stroke (odds ratio 1.53, 1.10 to 2.14). Conclusions These findings support the current strategy of directing patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome to the nearest hospital with acute care facilities, irrespective of the availability of a catheterisation laboratory, and argue against early routine transfer of these patients to tertiary care hospitals with interventional facilities.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary SyndromeJAMA, 2004
- Pharmacoinvasive TherapyCirculation, 2004
- Six-month outcomes in a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE])The American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Regionalization of Care for Acute Ischemic Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without invasive capabilityJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Six-month outcome in unstable angina patients without previous myocardial infarction according to the use of tertiary cardiologic resourcesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management StrategyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Six-Month Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Initially Admitted to Tertiary and Nontertiary HospitalsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997