Estimating completeness of cancer registration: an empirical evaluation of the two source capture-recapture approach in Germany.
Open Access
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 49 (4) , 426-430
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.49.4.426
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--In recent years, capture-recapture methods have become increasingly popular in estimating completeness of disease registries. This study aimed to assess the performance of the two source capture-recapture method in estimating the completeness of cancer registration. DESIGN--The study was conducted in the population based cancer registry of Saarland, Germany, for which there are three main sources of notifications: reports by clinicians and pathologists, and death certificates. For groups of cases notified by one of the three sources, known completeness of registration by the other two sources was compared with the corresponding two source capture-recapture estimates. PATIENTS--A total of 16,020 patients notified to the cancer registry in 1970, 1975, 1980, and 1985 were included in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS--There was a tendency towards underestimation of completeness of notifications from pathologists and death certificates for patients notified by clinicians which was essentially confined to the older age groups. In contrast, capture-recapture methods tended to overestimate completeness of notifications from clinicians and death certificates for patients notified by pathologists. This overestimation was observed consistently in all age groups and for all of the most common cancer sites. Nevertheless, deviations of estimated completeness from known completeness were generally small or moderate. Agreement between estimated and known completeness was closest for patients notified by death certificates, although completeness was somewhat underestimated in patients above age 75. The observed patterns are in agreement with knowledge on clinical aspects and clinical management of cancer patients and with the circumstances of cancer registration in Saarland. CONCLUSIONS--Careful application of capture-recapture methods may provide an alternative to traditional approaches for estimating completeness of cancer registration.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring the Incidence of Myocardial Infarctions: Applications of Capture-Mark-Recapture TechnologyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Capture-recapture methodsThe Lancet, 1992
- Counting birds, bees, and NCDsThe Lancet, 1992
- Availability and Completeness of Cancer Registration WorldwidePublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Cancer registration in the European CommunityInternational Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Completeness of Cancer Registration in Denmark 1943–1966 and Efficacy of Record Linkage ProceduresInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registrationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- Capture-recapture methods for assessing the completeness of case ascertainment when using multiple information sourcesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1974
- A generalization of the simple capture-recapture model with applications to epidemiological researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1968