Physicomechanical Evaluation of Polypropylene, Polyester, and Polytetrafluoroethylene Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair
Top Cited Papers
- 31 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 212 (1) , 68-79
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.012
Abstract
For meshes to be used effectively for hernia repair, it is imperative that engineers and surgeons standardize the terminology and techniques related to physicomechanical evaluation of these materials. The objectives of this study were to propose standard techniques, perform physicomechanical testing, and classify materials commonly used for inguinal hernia repair. Nine meshes were evaluated: 4 polypropylene, 1 polyester, 1 polytetrafluoroethylene, and 3 partially absorbable. Physical properties were determined through image analysis, laser micrometry, and density measurements. Biomechanical properties were determined through suture retention, tear resistance, uniaxial, and ball burst testing with specimens tested in 2 different orientations. A 1-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-test or a t-test were performed, with p < 0.05. Significant differences were observed due to both mesh type and orientation. Areas of interstices ranged from 0.33 ± 0.01 mm² for ProLite (Atrium Medical Corp) and C-QUR Lite (Atrium Medical Corp) Large to 4.10 ± 0.06 mm² for ULTRAPRO (Ethicon), and filament diameters ranged from 99.00 ±8.1 μm for ProLite Ultra (Atrium Medical Corp) and C-QUR Lite Small to 338.8 ± 3.7 μm for Parietex Flat Sheet TEC (Covidien). These structural characteristics influenced biomechanical properties such as tear resistance and tensile strength. ProLite Ultra, C-QUR Lite Small, ULTRAPRO and INFINIT (WL Gore & Associates) did not resist tearing as effectively as the others. All meshes exhibited supraphysiologic burst strengths except INFINIT and ULTRAPRO. Significant differences exist between the physicomechanical properties of polypropylene, polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene, and partially absorbable mesh prostheses commonly used for inguinal hernia repair. Orientation of the mesh was also shown to be critical for the success of meshes, particularly those demonstrating anisotropy.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshesHernia, 2009
- Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early resultsSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Major mesh-related complications following hernia repairSurgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral herniasHernia, 2005
- Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wallBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Tensile strength of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic incisional hernia repairSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implantsHernia, 2001
- Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshesHernia, 2001
- The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defectsHernia, 2001