Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment
- 23 July 2001
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD003170
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003170
Abstract
Background Asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration are visible lesions that are risk factors for later retinal detachment. Retinal detachments occur when fluid in the vitreous cavity passes through tears or holes in the retina and separates the retina from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium. Creation of an adhesion surrounding retinal breaks and lattice degeneration, with laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy, has been recommended as an effective means of preventing retinal detachment. This therapy is of value in the management of retinal tears associated with the symptoms of flashes and floaters and persistent vitreous traction upon the retina, because such symptomatic retinal breaks are associated with a high rate of progression to retinal detachment. Retinal tears and holes unassociated with acute symptoms and lattice degeneration are significantly less likely to be the sites of retinal breaks that are responsible for later retinal detachment. Nevertheless, treatment of these problems is frequently recommended, in spite of the fact that the effectiveness of this therapy is unproven. Objectives The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effects of interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register ‐ CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialized register), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Textbooks regarding retinal detachment and the reference lists of relevant reports were reviewed in an effort to find additional study reports. Experts in the field were contacted for details of other published and unpublished studies. Selection criteria This review was designed to include randomised controlled trials in which one treatment for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration was compared to another treatment or to no treatment. Data collection and analysis One reviewer assessed the search results and collected relevant studies. Since no studies met the inclusion criteria, no studies were assessed for methodological quality. No data were extracted and no meta‐analysis could be performed. Main results No trials were found that met the inclusion criteria for this review. Authors' conclusions No conclusions could be reached about the effects of surgical interventions to prevent retinal detachment in eyes with asymptomatic retinal breaks and/or lattice degeneration. Some current recommendations for treatment, based upon a consensus of expert opinion, are contradicted by the best available evidence.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence-based analysis of prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degenerationOphthalmology, 2000
- Retinal detachment in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 through 1995Ophthalmology, 1999
- What happens to untreated asymptomatic retinal breaks, and are they affected by posterior vitreous detachment?Ophthalmology, 1998
- Risk Factors for Retinal Detachment after Cataract SurgeryOphthalmology, 1996
- Risk Factors for Idiopathic Rhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- Long-term Natural History of Lattice Degeneration of the RetinaOphthalmology, 1989
- The Fellow Eye of Patients with Phakic Lattice Retinal DetachmentOphthalmology, 1989
- The Incidence of Retinal Detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970—1978American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- Epidemiology of Retinal DetachmentArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1982
- Vitreous Findings in Fellow Eyes of Aphakic Retinal DetachmentAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1978