Comparison of bone marrow, disseminated tumour cells and blood-circulating tumour cells in breast cancer patients after primary treatment
Open Access
- 25 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 100 (1) , 160-166
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604773
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary breast cancer patients showed evidence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) during follow-up as an alternative to monitoring disseminated bone marrow tumour cells (DTCs) by immunocytochemistry and reverse transcriptase (RT)–PCR for the detection of micrometastases. We planned to compare CTC and DTC frequency in low-risk and high-risk patients. We identified two cohorts of primary breast cancer patients who were at low (group II, T1N0, n=18) or high (group III, >3 nodes positive (with one exception, a patient with two positive nodes) n=33) risk of relapse who were being followed up after primary treatment. We tested each cohort for CTCs using the CellSearch system on 1–7 occasions and for DTCs by immunocytochemistry and RT–PCR on 1–2 occasions over a period of 2 years. We also examined patients with confirmed metastatic disease (group IV, n=12) and 21 control healthy volunteers for CTCs (group I). All group I samples were negative for CTCs. In contrast, 7 out of 18 (39%) group II primary patients and 23 out of 33 (70%) group III patients were positive for CTCs (P=0.042). If we count only samples with >1 cell as positive: 2 out of 18 (11%) group II patients were positive compared with 10 out of 33 (30%) in group III (P=0.174). In the case of DTCs, 1 out of 13 (8%) group II patients were positive compared with 19 out of 27 (70%) in group III (PP=0.033). A significant proportion of poor prognosis primary breast cancer patients (group III) have evidence of CTCs on follow-up. Many also have evidence of DTCs, which are more often found in patients who were lymph node positive. As repeat sampling of peripheral blood is more acceptable to patients, the measurement of CTCs warrants further investigation because it enables blood samples to be taken more frequently, thus possibly enabling clinicians to have prior warning of impending overt metastatic disease.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2007
- A Pooled Analysis of Bone Marrow Micrometastasis in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- The persistence of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients with breast carcinoma predicts an increased risk for recurrenceCancer, 2005
- Circulating Tumor Cells, Disease Progression, and Survival in Metastatic Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Dissecting the metastatic cascadeNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- A Randomized Trial of Exemestane after Two to Three Years of Tamoxifen Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Primary Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Cytokeratin-Positive Cells in the Bone Marrow and Survival of Patients with Stage I, II, or III Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Outcome of primary-breast-cancer patients with micrometastases: a long-term follow-up studyThe Lancet, 1999
- Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programsNucleic Acids Research, 1997
- Micrometastatic Breast Cancer Cells in Bone Marrow at Primary Surgery: Prognostic Value in Comparison With Nodal StatusJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996