Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 103 (2) , 682-692
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00092.2006
Abstract
Combining accelerometry with heart rate (HR) monitoring may improve precision of physical activity measurement. Considerable variation exists in the relationships between physical activity intensity (PAI) and HR and accelerometry, which may be reduced by individual calibration. However, individual calibration limits feasibility of these techniques in population studies, and less burdensome, yet valid, methods of calibration are required. We aimed to evaluate the precision of different individual calibration procedures against a reference calibration procedure: a ramped treadmill walking-running test with continuous measurement of PAI by indirect calorimetry in 26 women and 25 men [mean (SD): 35 (9) yr, 1.69 (0.10) m, 70 (14) kg]. Acceleration (along the longitudinal axis of the trunk) and HR were measured simultaneously. Alternative calibration procedures included treadmill testing without calorimetry, submaximal step and walk tests with and without calorimetry, and nonexercise calibration using sleeping HR and gender. Reference accelerometry and HR models explained >95% of the between-individual variance in PAI (P < 0.001). This fraction dropped to 73 and 81%, respectively, for accelerometry and HR models calibrated with treadmill tests without calorimetry. Step-test calibration captured 62–64% (accelerometry) and 68% (HR) of the variance between individuals. Corresponding values were 63–76% and 59–61% for walk-test calibration. There was only little benefit of including calorimetry during step and walk calibration for HR models. Nonexercise calibration procedures explained 54% (accelerometry) and 30% (HR) of the between-individual variance. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of the between-individual variance in relationships between PAI, accelerometry, and HR is captured with simple calibration procedures, feasible for use in epidemiological studies.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exerciseJournal of Sports Sciences, 2005
- Short-term intermittent exposure to diazoxide improves functional performance of β-cells in a high-glucose environmentAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2004
- Use of Heart Rate to Predict Energy Expenditure from Low to High Activity LevelsInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003
- Factors Affecting the Relation Between Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure During ExerciseInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1999
- A Study to Validate the Modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness TestCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 1995
- An Approach to Artifact Identification: Application to Heart Period DataPsychophysiology, 1990
- The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expenditure: a validation study using indirect whole-body calorimetryBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Quantitative description of whole blood CO2 dissociation curve and Haldane effectRespiration Physiology, 1983
- Effects of acute through life-long hypoxic exposure on exercise pulmonary gas exchangeRespiration Physiology, 1971