Deep-Vein Thrombosis and the Incidence of Subsequent Symptomatic Cancer
Open Access
- 15 October 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 327 (16) , 1128-1133
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199210153271604
Abstract
In contrast to the established relation between overt cancer and subsequent venous thromboembolism, it is unclear whether symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is associated with a risk of subsequent overt malignant disease. Two hundred sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic, venographically proved deep-vein thrombosis were enrolled in a study, of whom 250 were followed during a two-year period. Among those assessed during follow-up, the incidence of subsequently detected cancer in the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (i.e., thrombosis associated with a well-recognized risk factor other than cancer) was compared with the incidence of cancer in the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis. Routine examination at the time of diagnosis of the venous thrombosis revealed cancer in 5 of the 153 enrolled patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (3.3 percent) and in none of the 107 enrolled patients with secondary venous thrombosis. During follow-up, overt cancer developed in 2 of the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (1.9 percent) and in 11 of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (7.6 percent; odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.2; P = 0.043). Of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis, 35 had confirmed recurrent thromboembolism. Overt cancer subsequently developed in 6 of the 35 (17.1 percent). The incidence of cancer in the patients with recurrent idiopathic venous thrombosis was higher than that in the patients with secondary venous thrombosis (P = 0.008; odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 52.2) or in the patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis that did not recur (P = 0.024; odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 15.3). There is a statistically significant and clinically important association between idiopathic venous thrombosis and the subsequent development of clinically overt cancer, especially among patients in whom venous thromboembolism recurs during follow-up. (N Engl J Med 1992;327:1128–33.)Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Clinical Course of Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Hemostatic abnormalities in untreated cancer: incidence and correlation with thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Occult malignant neoplasm in patients with deep venous thrombosisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1987
- PRE-OPERATIVE IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS AFTER ELECTIVE MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERYThe Lancet, 1986
- Idiopathic deep vein thrombosis in an apparently healthy patient as a premonitory sign of occult cancerCancer, 1986
- Significance of idiopathic deep venous thrombosisPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1984
- A STUDY OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND DEEP LEG VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY USING LABELLED FIBRINOGEN‐PHLEBOGRAPHY AND LUNG SCANNINGBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1974
- ON PERIPHERAL THROMBOPHLEBITISJAMA, 1957
- SIGNIFICANCE OF IDIOPATHIC VENOUS THROMBOSIS AND HIDDEN CANCERJAMA, 1956
- PROGNOSIS IN IDIOPATHIC THOMBOPHLEBITISAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1951