Abstract
Volz has used the formula n=n0exp(n02.78nm) where n is the observed counting rate of the system, n0 is the rate of production of pulses in the counter and nm is the maximum possible random counting rate. It was found that n0, calculated from n and corrected for background count, varied as the inverse square of the distance from a gamma-ray source. Further, the absorption coefficient of Mo Kα rays in aluminum was found to have the correct value when measured by means of this formula. Thus the formula was satisfactory. The absolute F values were obtained by comparison of the (112¯2) reflection from zinc with the (420) reflection from KCl. This gives F(112¯2)=13.9. Brindley, using Cu Kα rays, obtains F(112¯2)=12.0. The difference is caused by dispersion. The F values for other reflections very closely agree with those found by Brindley for Cu Kα rays, when his values are corrected for dispersion. The very weak (0004) reflection, which was not obtained by Brindley, was found to have an F value of about 10.6. Jauncey and Bruce's values of the amplitudes of the thermal vibrations parallel and perpendicular to the c axis fit these results better than do Brindley's.