Endovascular vs. Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Medicare Population
Top Cited Papers
- 31 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (5) , 464-474
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0707348
Abstract
Randomized trials have shown reductions in perioperative mortality and morbidity with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, as compared with open surgical repair. Longer-term survival rates, however, were similar for the two procedures. There are currently no long-term, population-based data from the comparison of these strategies. We studied perioperative rates of death and complications, long-term survival, rupture, and reinterventions after open as compared with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in propensity-score–matched cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing repair during the 2001–2004 period, with follow-up until 2005. There were 22,830 matched patients undergoing open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in each cohort. The average age of the patients was 76 years, and approximately 20% were women. Perioperative mortality was lower after endovascular repair than after open repair (1.2% vs. 4.8%, P<0.001), and the reduction in mortality increased with age (2.1% difference for those 67 to 69 years old vs. 8.5% for those 85 years or older, P<0.001). Late survival was similar in the two cohorts, although the survival curves did not converge until after 3 years. By 4 years, rupture was more likely in the endovascular-repair cohort than in the open-repair cohort (1.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001), as was reintervention related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (9.0% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001), although most reinterventions were minor. In contrast, by 4 years, surgery for laparotomy-related complications was more likely among patients who had undergone open repair (9.7%, vs. 4.1% among those who had undergone endovascular repair; P<0.001), as was hospitalization without surgery for bowel obstruction or abdominal-wall hernia (14.2% vs. 8.1%, P<0.001). As compared with open repair, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with lower short-term rates of death and complications. The survival advantage is more durable among older patients. Late reinterventions related to abdominal aortic aneurysm are more common after endovascular repair but are balanced by an increase in laparotomy-related reinterventions and hospitalizations after open surgery.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving aneurysm-related outcomes: Nationwide benefits of endovascular repairJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
- Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
- Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Life expectancy after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Results of a decision analysis model on the basis of data from EUROSTARJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002
- Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experienceJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2000
- Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Reassurance from a 36-year population-based experienceJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- Transfemoral Intraluminal Graft Implantation for Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 1991