Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 98 (3) , 241-243
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13386.x
Abstract
Summary. Current practice with regard to the technique of blood pressure measurement in pregnancy was assessed by means of a self‐completed questionnaire sent to all midwives (116) and obstetricians (11) working in a UK District General Hospital obstetric unit. The response rate was 72% (91 respondents). Over half of the respondents (53%) use the fifth phase diastolic end point (contrary to current recommendations). Of the 75 respondents who had access to a large adult cuff 54 (72%) had used it on ‘less than two occasions’ over the preceding four weeks. Only 10% (9) of respondents reported that they record blood pressure to the nearest 2 mmHg and 23% (22) reported that they round blood pressure readings to the nearest 10 mmHg. There were diverse views on the interpretation of multiple blood pressure recordings. The conclusion is that compliance with current recommendations on blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy is poor. There is poor agreement among midwives and obstetricians as to how blood pressure should be recorded in pregnancy.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Recommendations on blood pressure measurement.BMJ, 1986
- Spurious hypertension in the obese patient. Effect of sphygmomanometer cuff size on prevalence of hypertensionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1984
- Divergent views of hospital staff on detecting and managing hypertension.BMJ, 1979