Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for polyps not suitable for endoscopic resection
- 16 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 21 (3) , 400-403
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9069-8
Abstract
Large colonic polyps or polyps that lie in anatomical locations that are difficult to access at endoscopy may not be suitable for endoscopic resection and therefore may require partial colectomy. This approach eradicates the polyp and allows an oncologic resection should the polyp prove to be malignant. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of a laparoscopic approach for the management of these polyps. Patients referred for laparoscopic colectomy for colonic polyps were identified from the prospective colorectal laparoscopic surgery database. Demographics, operative details, and final pathology were reviewed. Fifty-one consecutive patients (27 male) with a mean age of 68 ± 11.4 years, ASA classification (1/2/3/4) of 0/21/27/3, and body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 ± 4.9 were identified. Right (RHC) and left (LHC) colectomy was performed for 39 right and 12 left colonic polyps. Mean operating time (OT) was 87 ± 30 min (81 for RHC, 105 for LHC) and mean hospital stay was 3.1 ± 1.9 days. There were six complications (17.7%), including anastomotic leak (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 2), abscess (n = 1), and exacerbation of preexisting medical conditions (n = 2). Four patients were readmitted (7.8%); one required CT scan-guided abscess drainage (1.9%) and two required reoperation (3.9%). Five patients (9.8%) were converted because of adhesions (n = 3), obesity (n = 1), and inability to identify the area that was tattooed at colonoscopy (n = 1). Mean polyp size was 3.1 cm, and pathology revealed tubular (n = 14), tubulovillous (n = 33) and villous adenoma (n = 2), pseudopolyp (n = 1), and prolapse of the appendix into the cecum mimicking an adenoma (n = 1). High-grade dysplasia was seen in four tubular (33%) and five tubulovillous adenomas (15.5%). Adenocarcinoma not identified at colonoscopy was found in 11 polyps (20%), 9 tubulovillous (27.8%) and both villous adenomas (100%). Large colonic polyps unresectable at colonoscopy are associated with a high rate of unsuspected cancer. This requires a formal colectomy rather than transcolonic polypectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy offers safe and effective management of these polyps with the benefits of accelerated postoperative recovery.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection?: Laparoscopy versus laparotomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003
- Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Benefits of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Colon Polyps: A Case-Matched SeriesMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000
- Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?Surgical Endoscopy, 1998
- How big is too big?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Endoscopic snare excision of “giant” colorectal polypsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Laparoscopic Colotomy, PolypectomyAORN Journal, 1992