SEX BIAS IN JOB EVALUATION PROCEDURES
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 39 (2) , 315-335
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00584.x
Abstract
Issues pertaining to possible sex bias in job evaluation procedures are outlined and relevant research pertaining to these issues reviewed. Attention is given to possible sex bias in job analysis procedures, choice and weighting of factors, reliability and validity issues, and other concerns. Future research needs are discussed, with particular attention being paid to the reliability and validity aspects of job evaluation instruments.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Task experience and social cues: Interactive effects on attitudinal reactionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- Effects of Pay Expected on Pay Received: The Confirmatory Nature of Initial Expectations1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1984
- Systematic bias in job evaluation and market wages: Implications for the comparable worth debate.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- Reliabilities of selected ratings available from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles..Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- Social influences on judgments about tasksOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- Informational influence as a determinant of perceived task characteristics and job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Job enrichment versus social cues: A comparison and competitive test.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Job analysis results as influenced by sex of incumbent and sex of analyst.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959