Meta‐analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes
Open Access
- 23 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 57 (5) , 640-651
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02060.x
Abstract
Aims Since 2002, there have been five major outcome trials of statins reporting findings from more than 47 000 subjects. As individual trial results differed, we performed a meta‐analysis to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of statins overall and in subgroups. The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of statins on major coronary events and strokes, all‐cause mortality and noncardiovascular mortality, and in different subgroups. Methods PubMed was searched for trials published in English. Randomized placebo‐controlled statin trials with an average follow up of at least 3 years and at least 100 major coronary events were included. For each trial, the statin used, number and type of subjects, proportion of women, mean age and follow up, baseline and change in lipid profile, cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular outcomes were recorded. Results Ten trials involving 79 494 subjects were included in the meta‐analysis. Due to heterogeneity, ALLHAT‐LLT was excluded from some analyses. Statin therapy reduced major coronary events by 27% (95%CI 23, 30%), stroke by 18% (95%CI 10, 25%) and all‐cause mortality by 15% (95%CI 8, 21%). There was a 4% (95%CI −10, 3%) nonsignificant reduction in noncardiovascular mortality. The reduction in major coronary events is independent of gender and presence of hypertension or diabetes. The risk reduction was greater in smokers (P < 0.05). Coronary events were reduced by 23% (95%CI 18, 29%) in pravastatin trials and 29% (95%CI 25, 33%) in five trials using other statins. Pravastatin reduced strokes by 12% (95%CI 1, 21%) whilst other statins reduced strokes by 24% (95%CI 16, 32%) (P = 0.04). Conclusions Statins reduce coronary events, strokes and all‐cause mortality without increasing noncoronary mortality. The benefits accrue in men and women, hypertensives and normotensives, diabetics and nondiabetics, and particularly in smokers. Pravastatin appears to have less impact on strokes.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in general practice: Study had two major flawsBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2003
- Cross sectional survey of effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in reducing serum cholesterol concentration in patients in 17 general practicesBMJ, 2003
- Major Outcomes in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Pravastatin vs Usual Care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)JAMA, 2002
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA, 2001
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Events and Death with Pravastatin in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and a Broad Range of Initial Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Hypertriglyceridemia and elevated lipoprotein (a) are risk factors for major coronary events in middle-aged menThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Prevalence of Hypertension in the US Adult PopulationHypertension, 1995
- Cardiovascular disease risk profilesAmerican Heart Journal, 1991