Bond Illiquidity and Excess Volatility
Open Access
- 4 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 26 (12) , 3068-3103
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht037
Abstract
We find that the empirical volatilities of corporate bond and CDS returns are higher than implied by equity return volatilities and the Merton model. This excess volatility may arise because structural models inadequately capture either fundamentals or illiquidity. Our evidence supports the latter explanation. We find little relation between excess volatility and measures of firm fundamentals and the volatility of firm fundamentals but some relation with variables proxying for time-varying illiquidity. Consistent with an illiquidity explanation, firm-level bond portfolio returns, which average out bond-specific effects, significantly decrease excess volatility.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robust Inference With Multiway ClusteringJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2011
- Measuring Abnormal Bond PerformanceThe Review of Financial Studies, 2008
- Earnings Volatility, Cash Flow Volatility, and Informed TradingJournal of Accounting Research, 2008
- Corporate Bond Market Transaction Costs and TransparencyThe Journal of Finance, 2007
- Corporate Yield Spreads and Bond LiquidityThe Journal of Finance, 2007
- Comparing possible proxies of corporate bond liquidityPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An Empirical AnalysisThe Review of Financial Studies, 2004
- How Much of Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread Is Due to Credit Risk?: A New Calibration ApproachSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Do Credit Spreads Reflect Stationary Leverage Ratios?The Journal of Finance, 2001
- The Declining Credit Quality of U.S. Corporate Debt: Myth or Reality?The Journal of Finance, 1998