Polypeptide chain termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Genetics
- Vol. 25 (5) , 385-395
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351776
Abstract
The study of translational termination in yeast has been approached largely through the identification of a range of mutations which either increase or decrease the efficiency of stop-codon recognition. Subsequent cloning of the genes encoding these factors has identified a number of proteins important for maintaining the fidelity of termination, including at least three ribosomal proteins (S5, S13, S28). Other non-ribosomal proteins have been identified by mutations which produce gross termination-accuracy defects, namely the SUP35 and SUP45 gene products which have closely-related higher eukaryote homologues (GST1-h and SUP45-h respectively) and which can complement the corresponding defective yeast proteins, implying that the yeast ribosome may be a good model for the termination apparatus existing in higher translation systems. While the yeast mitochondrial release factor has been cloned (Pel et al. 1992), the corresponding cytosolic RF has not yet been identified. It seems likely, however, that the identification of the gene encoding eRF could be achieved using a multicopy antisuppressor screen such as that employed to clone the E. coli prfA gene (Weiss et al. 1984). Identification of the yeast eRF and an investigation of its interaction with other components of the yeast translational machinery will no doubt further the definition of the translational termination process. While a large number of mutations have been isolated in which the efficiency of termination-codon recognition is impaired, it seems probable that a proportion of mutations within this class will comprise those where the accuracy of ‘A’ site codon-anticodon interaction is compromised: such defects would also have an effect on termination-codon suppression, allowing mis- or non-cognate tRNAs to bind stop-condons, causing nonsense suppression. The remainder of mutatoons affecting termination fidelity should represent mutations in genes coding for components of the termination apparatus, including the eRF: these mutations reduce the efficiency of termination, allowing nonsense suppression by low-efficiency natural suppressor tRNAs. Elucidation of the mechanism of termination in yeast will require discrimination between these two classes of mutations, thus allowing definition of termination-specific gene products.Keywords
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the tryptophanyl‐tRNA synthetase and the peptide‐chain‐release factor from higher eukaryotes one and the same protein?European Journal of Biochemistry, 1993
- Ribosome‐bound EF‐1α‐like protein of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1991
- Mutations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12 influence the higher order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNAJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- SUF12 suppressor protein of yeastJournal of Molecular Biology, 1988
- Altered ribosomal protein S11 from the SUP46 suppressor of yeastJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981
- Misreading of the ribosomal suppressor SUP46 due to an altered 40 S subunit in yeastJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981
- Serine insertion caused by the ribosomal suppressor SUP46 in yeastJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981
- A ribosomal ambiguity mutationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1969
- Role of modifications in tyrosine transfer RNA: A modified base affecting ribosome bindingJournal of Molecular Biology, 1969
- Release factors differing in specificity for terminator codons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1968