Abstract
The very important and provocative letter by Dr. Eidelman in the January 1966 issue of Pediatrics prompts this further communication on the same subject. As I scan the advertisements, Warner-Chilcott's persistent omission of the ingredients in Tedral becomes disquieting. Admittedly to many of us Tedral has become a "household word," but surely this is no excuse for the absence of a notation concerning its makeup. One hopes that Warner-Chilcott is not establishing a trend in pharmaceutical advertising and attempting to lull the reader into regarding the drug purely by its commercial name rather than by its generic chemistry.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: