Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Urology
- Vol. 18 (2) , 173-179
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e3282f517d6
Abstract
In 2001, approximately 250 robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies were performed; in 2007, this number is expected to approach 50 000 surgeries. This surge has arguably been driven by the improved (real or perceived) clinical outcomes. In this review we assess ‘long-term’ experience based on reports recently published over the past 18 months. The short-term clinical outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies such as deaths, transfusions, postoperative complications and bladder neck contractures are excellent, and appear to be improved when compared to open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Recent findings regarding the early return of potency have emphasized the benefit of avoiding thermal energy when preserving the neurovascular bundle. In similar fashion, early continence rates appear to be improved by restoring posterior anatomic fascia. Local disease control as measured by surgical margin status appears to be at least equivalent to contemporary open series, but longer follow-up is needed. Three-dimensional and 10 times magnified vision, precise instrument control, and improved exposure coupled with the tamponade effect associated with the pneumoperitoneum have translated into reproducible improvements in patient comfort, and decreased mortality, blood loss and complications, including bladder neck contracture and deep venous thrombosis. These technical improvements would lead one to believe that improved results with continence, potency and oncologic outcomes should logically follow. Ultimately, long-term outcomes and possibly financial impact will determine the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multi-institutional Study of Symptomatic Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2008
- A Comparison of the Incidence and Location of Positive Surgical Margins in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2007
- Impact of Urethral Stump Length on Continence and Positive Surgical Margins in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic ProstatectomyUrology, 2007
- Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 casesBJU International, 2007
- Cancer Statistics, 2007CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2007
- Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomyUrology, 2006
- Postoperative Nomogram Predicting the 10-Year Probability of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- DO MARGINS MATTER? THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, 2005
- INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 1,000 CASESJournal of Urology, 2001
- Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2001