Attention allocation policy influences prospective timing
Open Access
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 5 (1) , 114-118
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209465
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic reviewPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997
- Controlled attention sharing influences time estimationMemory & Cognition, 1994
- Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgment: The Role of Information Processing and MemoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Dividing Attention between Temporal and Nontemporal Tasks: A Performance Operating Characteristic -POC- AnalysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Chapter 9 Experiencing and Remembering Time: Affordances, Context, and CognitionPublished by Elsevier ,1989
- The Psychophysics of Retrospective and Prospective TimingPerception, 1988
- Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived durationPerception & Psychophysics, 1985
- The Compleat Time ExperiencerPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processesMemory & Cognition, 1973