Relative Sensitivities and Specificities of Tests for Small Airways Obstruction
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Respiration
- Vol. 37 (6) , 301-308
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000194043
Abstract
This study compared several physiologic maneuvers for detecting small airways obstruction (SAO). Volume of isoflow best separated young smokers (average age – 27.6; average cigarette consumption – 9.3 pack years) from nonsmokers; this was true for comparisons of both population means and incidence of individual abnormality. However, assessment of individual abnormality by any test was greatly influenced by the criteria used to define abnormality. The best combination of test sensitivity and specificity was achieved by using the 95% confidence limits derived from a control population from the same laboratory. Even so, test results did not correlate significantly with pack years of cigarette smoking. Then, although tests for SAO are very sensitive, their prognostic value in young smokers is uncertain since abnormality presumably should correlate with extent of smoking.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The early detection of airway obstruction: Another perspectiveThe American Journal of Medicine, 1976
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYMPTOMS AND FUNCTIONAL ABNORMALITIES IN CLINICALLY HEALTHY CIGARETTE SMOKERSPublished by Elsevier ,1976
- Resistance of central and peripheral airways measured by a retrograde catheterJournal of Applied Physiology, 1967
- The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary functionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1966
- Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected PopulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary functionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1961
- The Relationship Between Airway Resistance, Airway Conductance and Lung Volume in Subjects of Different Age and Body Size12Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1958