Improved AIDS Surveillance Through Laboratory-Initiated CD4 Cell Count Reporting
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 16 (5) , 362-366
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-199712150-00009
Abstract
To evaluate laboratory-initiated CD4 reporting (LICR) for AIDS surveillance and for differences in cases found by LICR and traditional surveillance methods (i.e., health care provider or death certificate reports and medical record searches). We compared the characteristics of persons reported with AIDS between May 1993 and April 1994 by traditional methods or by LICR reports We received 643 LICR reports and 278 AIDS case reports. HIV status was available on 94% of LICR reports; 96% of these persons were HIV-infected. LICR reports were received on 250 (90%) AIDS cases. Cases found by LICR were less likely to be persons of color and to have opportunistic illnesses and more likely to live in rural areas. Cost of LICR to the health department was less than the salary of one research analyst. LICR, with a high positive predictive value, is a highly sensitive, timely, and relatively inexpensive method of surveillance and its use should be considered in other jurisdictions.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distribution of CD4+ T lymphocytes at diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining and other human immunodeficiency virus-related illnesses. The Adult and Adolescent Spectrum of HIV Disease Project GroupArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- The completeness of AIDS case reporting in New York CityPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Evaluation of active versus passive AIDS surveillance in Oregon.American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- Underreporting of AIDS cases in South Carolina, 1986 and 1987JAMA, 1989
- Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in New York City. Evaluation of an active surveillance systemJAMA, 1985