Recent deformation rates on Venus
- 25 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 99 (E11) , 23163-23171
- https://doi.org/10.1029/94je02196
Abstract
Constraints on the recent geological evolution of Venus may be provided by quantitative estimates of the rates of the principal resurfacing processes, volcanism and tectonism. This paper focuses on the latter, using impact craters as strain indicators. The total postimpact tectonic strain lies in the range 0.5–6.5%, which defines a recent mean strain rate of 10−18–10−17 s−1 when divided by the mean surface age. Interpretation of the cratering record as one of pure production requires a decline in resurfacing rates at about 500 Ma (catastrophic resurfacing model). If distributed tectonic resurfacing contributed strongly before that time, as suggested by the widespread occurrence of tessera as inliers, the mean global strain rate must have been at least ∼10−155 S−1, which is also typical of terrestrial active margins. Numerical calculations of the response of the lithosphere to inferred mantle convective forces were performed to test the hypothesis that a decrease in surface strain rate by at least two orders of magnitude could be caused by a steady decline in heat flow over the last billion years. Parameterized convection models predict that the mean global thermal gradient decreases by only about 5 K/km over this time; even with the exponential dependence of viscosity upon temperature, the surface strain rate drops by little more than one order of magnitude. Strongly unsteady cooling and very low thermal gradients today are necessary to satisfy the catastrophic model. An alternative, uniformitarian resurfacing hypothesis holds that Venus is resurfaced in quasi‐random “patches” several hundred kilometers in size that occur in response to changing mantle convection patterns. Under such a model, the observed crater strain distribution indicates that about 1% of the planet's surface is tectonically active at any time. However, this model requires a very weak crustal rheology to achieve surface velocities ∼100 mm/yr appropriate to the required “patch” size. Without well‐developed lateral weak zones, Venus is essentially a one‐plate planet, but one in which the lithosphere is able to respond to topography produced by mantle convection through faulting and limited horizontal movement. The net rate of tectonic activity is logarithmically intermediate between Earth and Mars: about 100 times slower than plate tectonics, but up to 100 times faster than planets where tectonic stress arises largely from lithospheric cooling and contraction.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Venus resurfacing rates: Constraints provided by 3‐D Monte Carlo simulationsGeophysical Research Letters, 1993
- Age of rifting and associated volcanism in Atla Regio, VenusGeophysical Research Letters, 1993
- Constraints on the thermal evolution of Venus inferred from Magellan dataJournal of Geophysical Research, 1993
- Anatomy of a Venusian hot spot: Geology, gravity, and mantle dynamics of Eistla RegioJournal of Geophysical Research, 1992
- Thermal buoyancy on Venus: Underthrusting vs subductionGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- Gravity anomalies, compensation mechanisms, and the geodynamics of Western Ishtar Terra, VenusJournal of Geophysical Research, 1991
- Limits on modes of lithospheric heat transport on Venus from impact crater densityGeophysical Research Letters, 1987
- The role of water in the deformation of duniteJournal of Geophysical Research, 1984
- Thermal evolution of VenusPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1984
- The transition from high temperature creep to fracture in Maryland diabaseJournal of Geophysical Research, 1982