Motor Programming Within a Sequence of Responses
- 1 March 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 8 (1) , 19-26
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1976.10735051
Abstract
Choice reaction time prior to a motor response has been shown to depend on the nature of the response to be made. This effect is assumed to represent variations in programming time. However, as the length of a response sequence increases this effect becomes smaller, suggesting that some response programming is postponed until after the response sequence is initiated. The present experiment studied this assumed programming within a sequence of responses. For sequences comprised of two Morse Code responses (e.g. dit-dah) the initial reaction time was independent of the terminal response. However, programming of this terminal response was apparent as a lengthening of the duration of intervals within the response when the terminal response was dah rather than dit. When programming of parts of the sequence is postponed beyond the reaction time interval, the programming occurs later and influences the timing of the sequence of responses.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975
- Response Programming in Simple and Choice ReactionsJournal of Motor Behavior, 1974
- Syllable-dependent pronunciation latencies in number naming: A replication.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Failure to find a syllabic effect in number namingMemory & Cognition, 1973
- Movement velocity and movement time as determiners of degree of preprogramming in simple movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970