Experimental condensation inhibition in constitutive and facultative heterochromatin of mammalian chromosomes
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cytogenetic and Genome Research
- Vol. 91 (1-4) , 113-123
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000056830
Abstract
What drives the dramatic changes in chromosome structure during the cell cycle is one of the oldest questions in genetics. During mitosis, all chromosomes become highly condensed and, as the cell completes mitosis, most of the chromatin decondenses again. Only chromosome regions containing constitutive or facultative heterochromatin remain in a more condensed state throughout interphase. One approach to understanding chromosome condensation is to experimentally induce condensation defects. 5-Azacytidine (5-aza-C) and 5-azadeoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) drastically inhibit condensation in mammalian constitutive heterochromatin, in particular in human chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and Y, as well as in facultative heterochromatin (inactive X chromosome), when incorporated into late-replicating DNA during the last hours of cell culture. The decondensing effects of 5-aza-C analogs, which do not interfere with normal base pairing in substituted duplex DNA, have been correlated with global DNA hypomethylation. In contrast, decondensation of constitutive heterochromatin by incorporation of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IdU) or other non-demethylating base analogs, or binding of AT-specific DNA ligands, such as berenil and Hoechst 33258, may reflect an altered steric configuration of substituted or minor-groove-bound duplex DNA. Consequently, these compounds exert relatively specific effects on certain subsets of AT-rich constitutive heterochromatin, i.e. IdU on human chromosome 9, berenil on human Y, and Hoechst 33258 on mouse chromosomes, which provide high local concentrations of IdU incorporation sites or DNA-ligand-binding sites. None of these non-demethylating compounds affect the inactive X chromosome condensation. Structural features of chromosomes are largely determined by chromosome-associated proteins. In this light, we propose that both DNA hypomethylation and steric alterations in chromosomal DNA may interfere with the binding of specific proteins or multi-protein complexes that are required for chromosome condensation. The association between chromosome condensation defects, genomic instability, and epigenetic reprogramming is discussed. Chromosome condensation may represent a key ancestral mechanism for modulating chromatin structure that has since been realloted to other nuclear processes.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Escapees on the X chromosomeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Progression into and out of mitosis.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 1999
- Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase geneNature, 1999
- How to Compact DNAScience, 1998
- DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother?Trends in Genetics, 1997
- Formation of de novo centromeres and construction of first-generation human artificial microchromosomesNature Genetics, 1997
- DNA methylation and genetic instability in colorectal cancer cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997
- MITOTIC CHROMOSOME CONDENSATIONAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 1996
- Exclusion of Specific Human Chromosomes into Micronuclei by 5-Azacytidine Treatment of Lymphocyte CulturesExperimental Cell Research, 1994
- X-chromosome inactivation and cell memoryTrends in Genetics, 1992