Current Standards of Care in Small-Cell and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Oncology
- Vol. 61 (Suppl. 1) , 3-13
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000055386
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, accounting for over 30% of cancer deaths in men and 25% in women. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are uniformly aggressive tumors, with rates of regional or distant metastases at diagnosis as high as 70%. Because the majority of these tumors are unresectable, patients with relatively good performance status receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Although no treatment consensus exists, currently recommended regimens for SCLC include PE (cisplatin and etoposide), CAV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine), CAE (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide), and CAVE (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide). Of these, the PE regimen has been widely accepted in the United States, although CE (carboplatin and etoposide) provides better tolerability. For NSCLC, standard chemotherapy regimens have included platinum-based therapy (cisplatin and a vinca alkaloid or PE). Data from recent studies suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to platinum modestly improves tumor response and survival in NSCLC. Although SCLC and NSCLC are both responsive to first-line chemotherapy, most patients relapse and die from their disease, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 15%. Given the disappointing survival rates associated with SCLC and NSCLC, the introduction of new cytotoxic agents has been eagerly anticipated. Evidence of improved response and extended survival is mounting for various combinations of established regimens (e.g., PE) with newer drugs exhibiting novel mechanisms of action and single-agent antitumor activity, such as gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and topotecan. This article reviews the current standards of care in SCLC and NSCLC, and introduces the potential role of newer agents given in combination with standard chemotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agentBritish Journal of Cancer, 2000
- The addition of cisplatin to cyclophosphamide‐doxorubicin‐etoposide combination chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinomaCancer, 1999
- Twice-Daily Compared with Once-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated Concurrently with Cisplatin and EtoposideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Phase II Trial of Topotecan Administered as a 21-Day Continuous Infusion in Previously Untreated Patients With Stage IIIB and IV Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-etoposide: Early results of a randomised phase II study in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1997
- Comparison of oral etoposide and standard intravenous multidrug chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a stopped multicentre randomised trialThe Lancet, 1996
- Investigation for mediastinal disease in patients with apparently operable lung cancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Polychemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 1993