Repeatability of diagnostic ultrasonography in the assessment of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon
- 5 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Equine Veterinary Journal
- Vol. 33 (1) , 33-37
- https://doi.org/10.2746/042516401776767494
Abstract
Summary: A quantitative investigation of the variation that can occur during the course of ultrasonography of the equine superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFT) was undertaken. The aim of this investigation was to use an objective measure, namely the measurement of CSA, to quantify the variability occurring during the course of the ultrasonographic assessment of the equine SDFT. The effects of 3 variables on the CSA measurements were determined. 1) Image acquisition operator (IAc): two different operators undertaking the ultrasonographic examination; 2) image analysis operator (IAn): two different operators undertaking the calculation of CSA values from previously stored images; and 3) analytical equipment (used during CSA measurement) (IEq): the use of 2 different sets of equipment during calculation of CSAvalues.Tendon cross‐sectional area (CSA) measurements were used as the comparative variable of 3 potential sources: interoperator, during image acquisition; interoperator, during CSA measurement; and intraoperator, when using different analytical equipment.Two operators obtained transverse ultrasonographic images from the forelimb SDFTs of 16 National Hunt (NH) Thoroughbred (TB) racehorses, each undertaking analysis of their own and the other operator's images. One operator undertook analysis of theirimages using 2 sets of equipment.There was no statistically significant difference in the results obtained when different operators undertook image acquisition (P>0.05). At all but the most distal level, there was no significant difference when different equipment was used during analysis (P>0.05). A significant difference (P<0.01) was reported when different operators undertook image analysis, one operator consistently returning larger measurements.Different operators undertaking different stages of an examination can result in significant variability. To reduce confounding during ultrasonographic investigations involving multiple persons, one operator should undertake image analysis, although different operators may undertake image acquisition.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVALUATION OF SUPERFICIAL DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDINITIS IN RACING HORSES THROUGH GRAY SCALE HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS OF TENDON ULTRASONOGRAMSVeterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 1996
- Ultrasonography as a method to determine tendon cross-sectional areaAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1995
- Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area and mean echogenicity of the superficial and deep digital flexor tendons in 50 trained Thoroughbred racehorsesAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1995
- The cross‐sectional areas of normal equine digital flexor tendons determined ultrasonographicallyEquine Veterinary Journal, 1994
- Sonographic brightness of the flexor tendons and ligaments in the metacarpal region of horsesAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1993
- Ultrasonographically detected changes in equine superficial digital flexor tendons during the first months of race trainingAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1993
- Ultrasonographic observations of the flexor tendons and ligaments of the metacarpal region of horsesAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1993
- Analysis of echotexture of tendons with US.Radiology, 1993