Multisite Reproducibility of Results Obtained by Two Broth Dilution Methods for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium avium Complex
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 41 (2) , 627-631
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.2.627-631.2003
Abstract
A multicenter study was conducted to assess the interlaboratory reproducibility of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) by broth microdilution using two different media (cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase and 7H9 broth with casein) and by macrodilution using the BACTEC 460TB and 12B media at pH 6.8 and 7.3 to 7.4. Ten well-characterized strains of MAC (four macrolide susceptible, six macrolide resistant) were tested against clarithromycin and azithromycin (the latter only by BACTEC 460TB, pH 6.8). At each site, strains were tested against clarithromycin three times on each of three separate days (nine testing events per isolate) by using a common lot of microdilution trays and BACTEC 12B medium, pH 6.8; strains were tested once on three separate days against clarithromycin in 12B medium at pH 7.3 to 7.4 and against azithromycin. Agreement among MICs (i.e., mode ± 1 twofold dilution) was 100% for all strains and both drugs when BACTEC 460TB was used, regardless of the pH of the medium, but varied when microdilution with either medium was used, particularly with susceptible strains. Agreement based on interpretive category, with NCCLS-recommended breakpoints, was 100% for all strains with the BACTEC 460TB method (both drugs and both pH values) and with microdilution using 7H9 broth. With microdilution and Mueller-Hinton broth, agreement by interpretive category was 100% for eight isolates and >90% for two; errors occurred only in laboratories where personnel had minimal experience with this technique. MAC susceptibility testing may be performed by broth macrodilution or microdilution at either pH, with NCCLS-recommended interpretive breakpoints. However, because visual interpretation of broth microdilution end points is subjective, it is more prone to reader error; therefore, this method requires greater expertise than the BACTEC 460TB. Both techniques require appropriate validation and continued documentation of proficiency.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium Complex on Bacterial Infections in Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus DiseaseClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Durable Cure for Tuberculosis: Rifalazil in Combination with Isoniazid in a Murine Model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Early Results (at 6 Months) with Intermittent Clarithromycin-Including Regimens for Lung Disease Due to Mycobacterium avium ComplexClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Does In Vitro Susceptibility to Rifabutin and Ethambutol Predict the Response to Treatment ofMycobacterium aviumComplex Bacteremia with Rifabutin, Ethambutol, and Clarithromycin?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Replication in AIDS Patients withMycobacterium aviumComplex Bacteremia: A Case Control StudyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Azithromycin Activity Against Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease in Patients Who Were Not Infected with Human Immunodeficiency VirusClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Molecular Mechanisms of Clarithromycin Resistance in Mycobacterium avium: Observation of Multiple 238 rDNA Mutations in a Clonal PopulationThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Activities of clarithromycin against eight slowly growing species of nontuberculous mycobacteria, determined by using a broth microdilution MIC systemAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1992
- Mycobacterium aviumComplex Infection in the Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Infection withMycobacterium aviumComplex in Patients without Predisposing ConditionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989