It's time for a change: cigarette smokers deserve meaningful information about their cigarettes.
Open Access
- 19 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 92 (2) , 90-92
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.2.90
Abstract
The study by Djordjevic et al. (1) in this issue of the Journal elegantly demonstrates that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) method of testing cigarettes for tar and nicotine provides tobacco companies the opportunity to mislead their customers. The study provides fresh insights as to the means by which human biology and tobacco engineering interact to cause the problem. The article reveals that smokers adjust a variety of their smoking behaviors, such as puff frequency, depth of inhalation, and ventilation hole blocking, thereby ingesting high levels of nicotine and tar irrespective of the advertised yields of the cigarettes. Moreover, the results show that cigarettes branded as “lights” can provide deliveries of tar and nicotine that are similar to those of the regular versions. It is highly unlikely that the small differences in tar and nicotine deliveries found across brands have any toxicologic significance.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doses of Nicotine and Lung Carcinogens Delivered to Cigarette SmokersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidenceAddiction, 2000
- Policy interventions to reduce the harm from smokingAddiction, 2000
- Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens and Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry's Secrets About NicotineJAMA, 1998
- The Food and Drug Administration's Regulation of Tobacco ProductsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Nicotine and AddictionJAMA, 1995
- Establishing a Nicotine Threshold for Addiction -- The Implications for Tobacco RegulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The Interaction of Psychosocial and Biological Determinants of Tobacco Use: More on the Boundary Model1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1984
- Nature of Cigaret Smoke: Technic of Experimental SmokingIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1936