Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Thresholds for the detection of temporal gaps were measured using two types of signals to mark the gaps: bandpass-filtered noises and sinusoids. The first experiment used seven subjects with relatively flat unilateral moderate cochlear hearing loss. The normal ear of each subject was tested both at the same sound-pressure level (SPL) as the impaired ear, and at the same sensation level (SL). Background noise was used to mask spectral ‘‘splatter’’ associated with the gap. For the noise markers, gap thresholds tended to be larger for the impaired ears than for the normal ears when the comparison was made at equal SPL; the difference was reduced, but not eliminated, when the comparison was made at equal SL. Gap thresholds for both the normal and impaired ears decreased as the center frequency increased from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. For the sinusoidal markers, gap thresholds were often similar for the normal and impaired ears when tested at equal SPL, and were larger for the normal ears when tested at equal SL. Gap thresholds did not change systematically with frequency. Gap thresholds using sinusoidal markers were smaller than those using noise markers. In the second experiment, three subjects with single-channel cochlear implants were tested. Gap thresholds for noise bands tended to increase with increasing center frequency when the noise bandwidth was fixed, and to decrease with increasing bandwidth when the center frequency was fixed. Gap thresholds for sinusoids did not change with center frequency, but decreased markedly with increasing level. Gap thresholds for sinusoids were considerably smaller than those for noise bands. The pattern of results is consistent with the idea that the inherent fluctuations in noise bands can limit gap thresholds; ‘‘dips’’ in the noise may be confused with the gap. This effect is more marked in subjects with cochlear hearing loss or cochlear implants owing to the presence of loudness recruitment, which makes the dips more prominent. The results suggest that temporal resolution per se is not necessarily adversely affected by cochlear hearing loss or in patients with cochlear implants.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: