Did Freud Mislead Patients to Confabulate Memories of Abuse?
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 74 (3_suppl) , 1283-1298
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3c.1283
Abstract
Freud's abandonment of the seduction theory within a year of first proposing it has been the subject of considerable recent debate and speculation. Closer examination of Freud's writings, however, shows that he had often used highly suggestive procedures to elicit the memories of childhood “seductions” from his patients. Moreover, he had not considered alternative explanations for the evidence he presented when first claiming that these recovered memories of sexual abuse were real. Nevertheless, some present-day authors have argued for the validity of recovered memories by presenting much the same type of evidence that Freud once did. Research is needed to assess the extent to which recovered memories can be clearly corroborated and to establish rules for distinguishing between real and false memories of abuse.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Child Sexual AbusePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Adult reconstruction of childhood events in the multiple personality literatureAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- The reality of repressed memories.American Psychologist, 1993
- Self‐reported amnesia for abuse in adults molested as childrenJournal of Traumatic Stress, 1993
- Psychiatric morbidity in adult inpatients with childhood histories of sexual and physical abuseAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1991
- Dissociative symptoms in relation to childhood physical and sexual abuseAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- Dr. Herman and Associates ReplyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
- Recovery and verification of memories of childhood sexual trauma.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1987
- Hypnotically Created Memory Among Highly Hypnotizable SubjectsScience, 1983
- Self-Perception TheoryPublished by Elsevier ,1972