Metacontrast Interference as Determined by a Method of Comparisons
- 1 February 1965
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 20 (1) , 279-285
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1965.20.1.279
Abstract
Interaction between successively presented visual stimuli with adjacent contours was investigated in order to see whether maximal metacontrast which appears typically at intermediate interstimulus intervals (ISI) is also obtainable when a method of comparisons is employed where several interference stimuli are shown, only one of which is preceded by a test stimulus. When such a method is used, for the two highly practiced Ss employed in this study data showed that the first stimulus was nearly always detectable at intermediate ISIs (50 to 100 msec.). However, when the duration of the test stimulus was very short, its detectability decreased as the interstimulus interval decreased, becoming maximal at the shortest interstimulus interval. Similar findings were obtained with the method of comparisons when the successively presented stimuli overlapped.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monoptic and dichoptic visual masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Intensity and contour effects in visual maskingVision Research, 1962
- Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV: spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interactionAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1962
- Effect of Luminance Ratio on MaskingPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1962
- Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- On Visual Masking (Metacontrast): Dichoptic ObservationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1960
- On Responses in the Human Visual System as a Function of Adaptation Level*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1957
- MetacontrastJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1953
- Studies on Contour: I. Qualitative AnalysesThe American Journal of Psychology, 1935