Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli.
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 90 (6) , 2827-2832
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2827
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional programmed ventricular stimulation protocols are inefficient compared with more recently proposed protocols. The purpose of the present study was to determine if additional efficiency could be derived from a 6-step programmed ventricular stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli. METHODS AND RESULTS The subjects were 209 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and documented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, aborted sudden death, or syncope. These patients underwent 159 electrophysiological tests in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and 105 electrophysiological tests in the presence of antiarrhythmic therapy. Programmed stimulation was performed with two protocols in random order in each patient. Both protocols used an eight-beat drive train, 4-s intertrain pause, and basic drive cycle lengths of 350, 400, and 600 ms. The 6-step protocol started with coupling intervals of 290, 280, 270, and 260 ms, which were shortened simultaneously in 10-ms steps until S2 was refractory. The 18-step protocol used one, two and three extrastimuli in conventional sequential fashion. The end points were 30 s of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, two episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion, or completion of the protocol at two right ventricular sites. There was no significant difference in the yield of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia using the two protocols, regardless of the clinical presentation or treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred with the 18-step protocol twice as frequently as with the 6-step protocol (6% versus 3%, P < .001). The duration of the 18-step protocol was significantly longer than that of the 6-step protocol in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (5.5 +/- 7 versus 2.3 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001), as well as in patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia (25.4 +/- 7 versus 6.9 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001). CONCLUSION A stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli improves the specificity and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation without compromising the yield of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of successful suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias by serial drug testing from data derived at the initial electrophysiologic studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Mexiletine-quinidine combination: Electrophysiologic correlates of a favorable antiarrhythmic interaction in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Programmed electrical stimulation in healed myocardial infarction using a standardized ventricular stimulation protocolThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Comparison of coupling intervals that induce clinical and nonclinical forms of ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Programmed electrical stimulation and long-term follow-up in asymptomatic, nonsustained ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Clinical significance of ventricular fibrillation-flutter induced by ventricular programmed stimulationAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Comparison in the same patient of two programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to induce ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Programmed ventricular stimulation at a second right ventricular site: An analysis of 100 patients, with special reference to sensitivity, specificity and characteristics of patients with induced ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Induction of clinical ventricular tachycardia using programmed stimulation: Value of third and fourth extrastimuliThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983