PHYLOGENY AFFECTS ESTIMATION OF METABOLIC SCALING IN MAMMALS
Open Access
- 1 November 2002
- Vol. 56 (11) , 2330-2333
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00156.x
Abstract
The relationship between body size and metabolic rate is a crucial issue in organismal biology and evolution. There has been considerable debate over whether the scaling exponent of the relationship is 0.75 (Kleiber’s Law) or 0.67. Here we show that determination of this exponent for mammals depends on both the evolutionary tree and the regression model used in the comparative analysis. For example, more recent molecular-based phylogenies tend to support a 0.67 exponent, whereas older phylogenies, mostly based on morphological data, suggest a 0.75 exponent. However, molecular phylogenies yield more variable results than morphological phylogenies and thus are not currently helping to resolve the issue.<br /Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular and Morphological Supertrees for Eutherian (Placental) MammalsScience, 2001
- Re-examination of the “3/4-law” of MetabolismJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2001
- Allometric Slopes and Independent Contrasts: A Comparative Test of Kleiber’s Law in Primate Ranging PatternsThe American Naturalist, 2000
- Life histories of the Insectivora: the role of phylogeny, metabolism and sex differencesJournal of Zoology, 1999
- ENERGETICS OF FREE-RANGING MAMMALS, REPTILES, AND BIRDSAnnual Review of Nutrition, 1999
- Covariation of Life-History Traits in Lacertid Lizards: A Comparative StudyThe American Naturalist, 1997
- Functional Response During Winter of a Herbivore, The Moose, in Relation to Age and SizeEcology, 1992
- The relationships of the major group of mammals: New approachesTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1988
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985
- Energy Metabolism, Brain Size and Longevity in MammalsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1983