Residency differentials in Mormon fertility
- 1 March 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Population Studies
- Vol. 28 (1) , 143-151
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1974.10404583
Abstract
Although one of the most consistent findings of recent fertility studies is the convergence of the religious differentials in fertility, few data have been analysed to discover Mormon fertility trends and differentials. This paper, based on data obtained on 1,001 Mormon couples, is concerned with describing the effects that the dispersion of Mormon families from the Mormon centre in Utah to surrounding areas with various social conditions is having on the fertility of the re-located Mormon families. Data presented clearly show that such families do, on the average, have a lower fertility than do their Mormon contemporaries residing in the homogeneous Mormon society in Utah. They probably compromise their religious obligations to have children with the contradicting demands of their new environment. Their loyalty to these religious beliefs, however, is confirmed by data which show that they tend to have larger families in their new environments than do their non-Mormon neighbours.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mormonism and Birth Planning: The discrepancy between church authorities' teachings and lay attitudesPopulation Studies, 1972
- Mormonism and Birth Planning: The Discrepancy between Church Authorities' Teachings and Lay AttitudesPopulation Studies, 1972
- College Women and Fertility ValuesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1967
- A Genealogical Approach to the Study of French-Canadian Fertility 1650-1950Sociological Analysis, 1965
- Third ChildPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1963
- Family Growth in Metropolitan AmericaPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1961
- The fertility of two-generation urbanitesPopulation Studies, 1959
- The Mormon FamilyAmerican Sociological Review, 1937
- Theories Modernes sur les Origines de la Famille, de la Societe et de l'Etat.Adolphe Posada , F. de ZeltnerAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1897