Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 132 (5) , 692-731
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
Abstract
A central theme in recent research on attitudes is the distinction between deliberate, "explicit" attitudes and automatic, "implicit" attitudes. The present article provides an integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes! Whereas associative processes are characterized by mere activation independent of subjective truth or falsity, propositional reasoning is concerned with the validation of evaluations and beliefs. The proposed associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model makes specific assumptions about the mutual interplay of the 2 processes, implying several mechanisms that lead to symmetric or asymmetric changes in implicit and explicit attitudes. The model integrates a broad range of empirical evidence and implies several new predictions for implicit and explicit attitude change.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canada Research Chairs Program (202555)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2005-1339)
- University of Western Ontario (05-303)
This publication has 198 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accessibility Effects on Implicit Social Cognition: The Role of Knowledge Activation and Retrieval Experiences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Liking Is for Doing: The Effects of Goal Pursuit on Automatic Evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- Measuring evaluative conditioning using the Implicit Association TestLearning and Motivation, 2003
- Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- Attributional complexity as a moderator of dissonance-produced attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996).Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- How mental systems believe.American Psychologist, 1991
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986